Closed vicentebolea closed 1 year ago
@burlen
ok, no problem. Apparently spack ci setup has not been updated to test w/ 2.9 otherwise I assume this would have been caught before the last merge. Would it make sense to include those changes for the spack ci in this pr so that we have testing of this change before it goes in?
Followup of #114
In #114 we accidentally wrote:
However, what we want is: