Closed roanBBC closed 1 year ago
I looked into this a bit this morning (mostly from the perspective of how to make the LWC flexible enough on parameters that we can release the code/package publicly and not have a big parameter change in the future). At the minimum, I think we want to pass the LWC a collection of fieldNames for the left side columns and a collection of fieldNames for the right side columns.
To match current LWC functionality - in addition to that, it seems like the user could optionally want the ability to label those columns as they wish - so instead of being just a collection of strings (the fieldNames) we'd want collections of <String, String>.
For the eventual best user experience though - we probably want to setup a custom property editor LWC for our sticky-selector and I think this SF help page shows a way of doing that.
First version of this is completed and team has tested
Provide UI and infrastructure for dynamically defining which columns will display