Closed detrumi closed 7 years ago
The problem with this repo in general is that we don't have a defined asset pack format yet (see SFTtech/openage#632). Also, we need the possibility to load the replacement data instead of the original ones.
Still, this is a good idea :)
What do you think how we should progress? Ignore the asset pack format for now or something else?
Well, the pack format should be designed in such a way that the original assets can be mapped to the new format. Categorizing the assets should help with understanding the structure we need to support in the pack format. So yes, I think we should ignore the pack format until we know exactly how the old format works.
I've started adding placeholders for new assets, for 3 reasons:
Asset types