Open zhangyu2ustc opened 5 years ago
the performance of using different brain graphs are very similar. for motor classification (epochs=40): train_acc test_acc spatial: 0.94 0.90 SC: 0.93 0.90 RSFC: 0.93 0.90
we need to figure out the reason. After plotting the Adj-matrix using imshow, we do see a big difference between brain graphs. Why the performance did not change? maybe during KNN-graph setting?
the first step of GCN is to construct a populational graph. there are three types of brain graphs we could choose:
In the 2nd and 3rd graphs, we need to additionally construct a sparse KNN graph because it is very dense which might cause computational problems
Note, previously I had made a mistake by taking the weakest connections for the KNN graph, which has worsen the performance of GCN. Now it worked and we could compare them.