Closed kontsaki closed 3 years ago
@kontsaki the problem now is this reverts changes from the target branch (such as the email change) among other things.
Merging back from master like this just basically takes all the conflicts wholesale from master instead of actually resolving them.
This is why I said the rebase needs to be done - merging branches back like this also leave a pretty ugly looking git history.
the problem now is this reverts changes from the target branch (such as the email change) among other things.
@goodboy do you mean that there are changes that are missing?
sorry, i haven't used rebase much to understand what's the difference with merging except merge commits
i'm reading that rebasing is not good for already published branches, it will require a force push if i understand correctly
i'm reading that rebasing is not good for already published branches, it will require a force push if i understand correctly
Yes nothing wrong with this imo. IIRC there was something distinctly missing last time I looked at this diff; it's the cognative load of looking through so many non-functional changes that makes me put this kinda thing off 😉
I remember at the least the new email in setup.py
looks like it was lost, there might be more?
I have to go through this in detail I think unfortunately...
Again this is why I'd recommend in the future making functional changes separate from broad style patches.
setup.py email is the same at master and #55
same for __init__.py
even though they differ from setup.py
this seems to be an old mismatch
Ok we'll do it your way and try merging this because what I thought was off isn't 😂
I'm going to push up a clone of the branch for #63 to see how things look after merging this into that branch.
ping :)
Aight pushed up a clone of drop_py27
in case we run into any issues 🕶️.
Gonna merge this!
this fixes the conflicts i've introduced by formatting with black