SIGTERM is not handled the same as SIGINT

SK-Yang / memcached

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/memcached

0 stars 0 forks source link

SIGTERM is not handled the same as SIGINT #386

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Please handle SIGTERM the same as SIGINT. This is basically a one-line code 
change and helps memcached play nicely with Docker, Foreman, and anything else 
that uses SIGTERM to manage child processes.

I submitted a pull request for this over on Github 
(https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/88), but I thought I'd open an 
issue here as well.

Thanks!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by m...@embody.org on 1 Dec 2014 at 5:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I'll handle this from the PR

Original comment by dorma...@rydia.net on 1 Jan 2015 at 6:52

Changed state: Invalid