An element, attribute, value, property, and instance is usually specified using the code font. Also perhaps when specifying a marker, tag, or identifier? There are many instances throughout the document where they are not written in code font:
Introduction, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2: Asset element
Introduction, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2: CompositionMetadataAsset element
5.1, Paragraph1: XML elements (not sure if code font is warranted here)
5.4.1, Paragraph 3: Duration element
5.4.1, Paragraph 3: Reel element
5.4.2.2, Paragraph 1: language attribute (not sure if code font is warranted here. If it is, then should "language" be uppercase?)
5.4.2.3, Paragraph 1, Sentence 2: scope attribute (not sure if code font is warranted here. If it is, then should "scope" be "Scope"?)
5.4.2.3, Paragraph 2, Sentence 1: scope value (2 instances) (not sure if code font is warranted here. If it is, then should "scope" be "Scope"?)
5.4.2.3, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2: region subtag (not sure if code font is warranted here. If it is, then should "region" be "Region"?)
5.4.2.3, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2: Should "001" be in code font, instead of italic?
5.4.2.4, Paragraph 2: Re status attribute, should "status" be "Status"?
5.4.2.8, Paragraph 1: ContentVersion element
5.4.2.9: units attribute type
5.4.2.12, Paragraph 2: Height and Width elements (Are these, and the Height and Width in 5.4.2.13, Paragraph 2 actually attributes?)
5.4.2.14, Paragraph 3: Language element
5.4.2.15, Paragraph 1: Name element
5.4.1.15, Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4: scope attribute. Should "scope" also be "Scope"?
5.4.5.1, Paragraph 2: Name value
5.4.5.2: Name element
5.4.5.2: property (not sure if code font is warranted here. If it is, then should "property" be "Property"?)
5.4.5.3: Value element
5.4.5.3: property (not sure if code font is warranted here. If it is, then should "property" be "Property"?)
6.1, Table 3, Title Row, Col 3, Sentence 1: /CompositionPlaylist/ContentTitleText
6.1, Table 3, Maturity Rating Row, Col 3: Rating elements
6.1, Table 3, FFMC Row, Col 3: Marker, Label, FFMC
An element, attribute, value, property, and instance is usually specified using the
code
font. Also perhaps when specifying a marker, tag, or identifier? There are many instances throughout the document where they are not written in code font:code
font?Also, items that most likely should be identified as elements. The font is in most instances is correct, but "element" is missing:
Chain
shall contain..."Distributor
shall contain..."AlternativeContentVersionList
allows..."MainPictureActiveArea
is used..."