When referring generally to a soundfield group, i.e., not a specific setting (e.g., SoundfieldGroupLabelSubDescriptor), the term is all lowercase.
I just completed editing ST 2021-4, BROADCAST EXCHANGE FORMAT (BXF) - SCHEMA DOCUMENTATION, in which was the following statement pertaining to a change in the annotation of the numberOfSoundfieldGroups item:
numberOfSoundfieldGroups: “Soundfield groups” was corrected to “SoundfieldGroups”, so that the annotation states: “The number of SoundfieldGroups contained in the stream.”
Should the same be done in this document, i.e., change the general term to "SoundfieldGroup"? Example A.3.7, PAragraph 2 would change to:
The presence of such a SoundfieldGroup shall be indicated by SoundfieldGroupLabelSubDescriptor instance whose MCALabel Dictionary ID value is equal to one of the UL specified at SMPTE ST 428-12.
When referring generally to a soundfield group, i.e., not a specific setting (e.g., SoundfieldGroupLabelSubDescriptor), the term is all lowercase.
I just completed editing ST 2021-4, BROADCAST EXCHANGE FORMAT (BXF) - SCHEMA DOCUMENTATION, in which was the following statement pertaining to a change in the annotation of the numberOfSoundfieldGroups item: numberOfSoundfieldGroups: “Soundfield groups” was corrected to “SoundfieldGroups”, so that the annotation states: “The number of SoundfieldGroups contained in the stream.”
Should the same be done in this document, i.e., change the general term to "SoundfieldGroup"? Example A.3.7, PAragraph 2 would change to: The presence of such a SoundfieldGroup shall be indicated by SoundfieldGroupLabelSubDescriptor instance whose MCALabel Dictionary ID value is equal to one of the UL specified at SMPTE ST 428-12.