Hi,
Thank you very much for the useful software. I have used SModelS for a long time. It's great!
When I doing research about searching smuon, I find some problems about using 'xseccomputer' to calculating cross section.
xsection from paper:
According to paper arxiv:1908.08215 ( ATLAS-SUSY-2018-32 ) Page 5
the cross-section for ˜ℓ ˜ℓ production, each with a mass of 500 GeV, is 0.47 ± 0.03 fb for each generation of left-handed sleptons and 0.18 ± 0.01 fb for each generation of right-handed sleptons.
and from paper 1310.2621 Page 26 ; and paper 1801.10357 Page 8-9 , we can see that:
For 500GeV smuon_L and smuon_R, at 13TeV pp collider, the LO cross section is :
pp -> smuon_L smuon_L 0.42fbpp -> smuon_R smuon_R 0.16fb
xsection from xseccomputer(SmodelS):
And we can do a quick check, the files
to_sm2.txtto_sm8.txt
containted NMSSM spectrum and decay information (calculated by NMSSMTools) .
In both files, the mass of smuon is about 500GeV.
To get the cross section (using xseccomputer in SModelS), we can run the code
./smodelsTools.py xseccomputer -s 8 13 -e 10000 -c 1 -p -f to_sm2.txt
in the latest smodels-2.1.1.
which means the LO cross section ( pp -> smuon_L smuon_L ) is 0.25 fb, and (pp -> smuon_R smuon_R) is too small to print. And it's very different from the paper
And I have to mention that when I change the number of event,
./smodelsTools.py xseccomputer -s 8 13 -e 50000 -c 1 -p -f to_sm2.txt./smodelsTools.py xseccomputer -s 8 13 -e 100000 -c 1 -p -f to_sm2.txt
the cross section ( pp -> smuon_L smuon_L ) and ( pp -> smuon_R smuon_R ) have different values. (I do delete the old xsection in to_sm2.txt file)
xsection from Madgraph:
And we have used Madgraph to check this cross section.
I'm using MG5_aMC_v2_9_6.
import model nmssm
generate p p > mul- mul+
launch
import model nmssm
generate p p > mur- mur+
launch
we replace the param_card.dat with to_sm2.txt , and keep the nevent 10000, 13TeV collider. we get
Run | Collider | Banner | Cross section (pb) | Events | Data | Output
run_01 | p p6500.0 x 6500.0 GeV | tag_1 | 0.000324 ± 6.5e-07 | 10000 | parton madevent | LHE
run_01 | p p6500.0 x 6500.0 GeV | tag_1 | 0.0001338 ± 2.8e-07 | 10000 | parton madevent | LHE
which means the LO cross section ( pp -> smuon_L smuon_L ) is 0.324 fb, and (pp -> smuon_R smuon_R) is 0.133 fb .
It's larger than the xsection from xseccomputer(SmodelS).
And it's close to the paper
The file 'to_sm8.txt' spectrum using as input,the same thing will happen.
I think that xseccomputer is using pythia8 to compute the cross section.
The reason might be that some error in the settings,or I am using NMSSM model, the program only support MSSM, or pythia cannot calculated all SUSY process cross section in high accuracy only run once....
I want to know what went wrong.
Hope to hear from you soon!
Thank you very much!
Hi, Thank you very much for the useful software. I have used SModelS for a long time. It's great!
When I doing research about searching smuon, I find some problems about using 'xseccomputer' to calculating cross section.
xsection from paper:
According to paper arxiv:1908.08215 ( ATLAS-SUSY-2018-32 ) Page 5
and from paper 1310.2621 Page 26 ; and paper 1801.10357 Page 8-9 , we can see that:
xsection from xseccomputer(SmodelS):
And we can do a quick check, the files to_sm2.txt to_sm8.txt containted NMSSM spectrum and decay information (calculated by NMSSMTools) . In both files, the mass of smuon is about 500GeV.
Noted: smuon_L 1000013 ; smuon_R 2000013
To get the cross section (using xseccomputer in SModelS), we can run the code
./smodelsTools.py xseccomputer -s 8 13 -e 10000 -c 1 -p -f to_sm2.txt
in the latest smodels-2.1.1.And we have :
which means the LO cross section ( pp -> smuon_L smuon_L ) is 0.25 fb, and (pp -> smuon_R smuon_R) is too small to print. And it's very different from the paper
And I have to mention that when I change the number of event,
./smodelsTools.py xseccomputer -s 8 13 -e 50000 -c 1 -p -f to_sm2.txt
./smodelsTools.py xseccomputer -s 8 13 -e 100000 -c 1 -p -f to_sm2.txt
the cross section ( pp -> smuon_L smuon_L ) and ( pp -> smuon_R smuon_R ) have different values. (I do delete the old xsection in to_sm2.txt file)xsection from Madgraph:
And we have used Madgraph to check this cross section. I'm using MG5_aMC_v2_9_6.
we replace the param_card.dat with to_sm2.txt , and keep the nevent 10000, 13TeV collider. we get
which means the LO cross section ( pp -> smuon_L smuon_L ) is 0.324 fb, and (pp -> smuon_R smuon_R) is 0.133 fb . It's larger than the xsection from xseccomputer(SmodelS). And it's close to the paper
The file 'to_sm8.txt' spectrum using as input,the same thing will happen.
I think that xseccomputer is using pythia8 to compute the cross section. The reason might be that some error in the settings,or I am using NMSSM model, the program only support MSSM, or pythia cannot calculated all SUSY process cross section in high accuracy only run once....
I want to know what went wrong. Hope to hear from you soon! Thank you very much!
Mike