Closed ryancoe closed 3 years ago
All tests pass: test_results.pdf
@ryancoe, I can't run this case, so you should probably ask Sterling to take a look at it.
@H0R5E - What's preventing you from running this case?
Ryan Case C uses the "Global optimization toolbox" not the optimization toolbox. So I can look into this.
This is caseA
-- my mistake in labeling the PR.
So, I have pushed some of the functionality in this case to the Performance class plot functions (such as setting the interpreter and font size) and tidied up a bit. This also sets the font of the x and y axis labels to latex, which I think is how it should be.
The other change I made here was to change 1 \omega to simply \omega in the x-axis tick labels. It's unusual to put 1 * x rather than just x.
If you feel OK with these changes, then I'd be happy for this to be merged now.
All tests pass and looks good to me: test_results.pdf
Description
It is nice to label the x-axis for this case with integer multiples of the fundamental frequency to better highlight the harmonics. I've also remove the
xticklabel
s from the first row of axes.Checklist: