Contacts Statistics

[Iheanacho2027]

There is no "contacts" attribute in statistics menu filtering options. There is a need for this because in future, data management analyst may need to carry out statistical analysis as regards the number of followed-up and unfollowed contacts available on the SORMAS platform. There should be also be sub-attributes for followed-up, unfollowed and lost to follow-up contacts

[MateStrysewske]

@Iheanacho2027 That's because the statistics section right now exclusively supports cases, none of the other entities in SORMAS. So this is more a matter of extending the statistics to also include information about contacts which I absolutely see the reasoning for. I've renamed the issue accordingly.

[Iheanacho2027]

Also in addition to this, can we also have information on sample results in the statistics menu

[foyiri]

yes the lab forks should be able to carry out sample analysis on the platform like how many sample were received how many were test etc

[faatihi]

users should be able to extract statistics of contacts per region/district for a particular disease

[faatihi]

An example of statistics that might be needed from contacts

The numbered circles:

1. Group columns by Follow-up status
2. Show number of contacts
3. Figures are shown per "Follow-up status" and by District

[faatihi]

I've come up with two UI design proposals

1. Tabbed statistics

2. Using grouped-buttons

I would like your opinions

[MartinWahnschaffe]

Vote for the first option (tabbed)

[MateStrysewske]

Seconding this.

[Iheanacho2027]

I prefer the second because it looks more detailed

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:57 PM Martin Wahnschaffe notifications@github.com wrote:

Vote for the first option (tabbed)

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/hzi-braunschweig/SORMAS-Project/issues/1281#issuecomment-607233157, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMDDTGIPWK3XAWUTVVOQAK3RKM233ANCNFSM4IQLR73A .

[foyiri]

I think the second looks more better

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 1:59 PM Iheanacho2027 notifications@github.com wrote:

I prefer the second because it looks more detailed

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:57 PM Martin Wahnschaffe < notifications@github.com> wrote:

Vote for the first option (tabbed)

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/hzi-braunschweig/SORMAS-Project/issues/1281#issuecomment-607233157 , or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMDDTGIPWK3XAWUTVVOQAK3RKM233ANCNFSM4IQLR73A

.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/hzi-braunschweig/SORMAS-Project/issues/1281#issuecomment-607234216, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHGCNWZY3CGQGT2Q5ZI6AZ3RKM3EPANCNFSM4IQLR73A .

[MateStrysewske]

@Iheanacho2027 They're both exactly the same, the only difference is that in option A), you choose whether to get case or contact statistics via a tab menu while in option B), you make the same choice in a switch field.

[faatihi]

Thanks for your input. I've gone for tabbed. It's easier to reason about ...from developer's point.