Add new community facility value for Germany to ReportingType [0.5]

[markusmann-vg]

Situation Description

Feature Description

Refine field “type of reporting” for cases

Case > case information > type of reporting

Change values (only DE) –

• [ ] Add a new value “Gemeinschaftseinrichtung § 34“.
• [ ] New Caption for „community facility“ in Germany to „Gemeinschaftseinrichtung … § 8“ [SurvNet field name: NotificationType]

Data Type: Dropdown/enum Values (de-de) | (en) • nicht erhoben- | data not collected • -nicht ermittelbar- | unknown • Arzt/Ärztin | doctor • Labor | Laboratory • Eigne Ermittlungen | own determination • Gemeinschaftseinrichtung gemäß § 8 (1) 7 IfSG | Community facility (§ 8 IfSG) • Gemeinschaftseinrichtung gemäß § 34 IfSG | Community facility (§ 34 IfSG) • Weiterleitung von einem anderen GA | Forwarding • Krankenhaus | Hospital or stationary care

Possible Alternatives

Additional Information

[GabrielePoggensee]

IfSG relevant - § 9: Definition of notification data to be reported to the local health department

SurvNet: Data not transmitted to state and public health authority

[JonasCir]

@markusmann-vg @GabrielePoggensee I know how to implement the fields mentioned by Markus, however, I am confused about

SurvNet: Data not transmitted to state and public health authority

Does this mean, the fields need to be present in SORMAS, but the fields are never exported to SurvNet at all?

---

Second question: Should the enum variant ReportingType.COMMUNITY_FACILITY be removed for German Systems (i.e., such that only COMMUNITY_FACILITY_IfSG_ARTICLE_8 and COMMUNITY_FACILITY_IfSG_ARTICLE_34 exist in Germany) or should it be retained such that in total 3 variants are available for community facilities in Germany?

[JonasCir]

Blocked on https://github.com/hzi-braunschweig/SORMAS-Project/issues/3653

[kwa20]

"not raised" (nicht erhoben) is basically the same as an empty entry or null value and I think should therefore be removed.

[bernardsilenou]

@kwa20 You are right.

• To be consistent with other sections, I would additionally say we rename "not determinable" to "unknown"
• delete "not raised" option and migrate old records to unknown (ie not determinable)

[kwa20]

Do this issue together with #4165 -> laboratory (DEMIS)

[bernardsilenou]

@kwa20 I thought we decided to add a variable "laboratory name" when lab is chosen "laboratory name" == demis + others, Just as we have in sample Drop-down with all names of labs in the system

[kwa20]

@bernardsilenou DEMIS is not actually a laboratory so it might not work like that

[bernardsilenou]

@kwa20 Thats right, Thanks, Then what about removing "laboratory" from the name and just put DEMIS in the drop-down?

[kwa20]

@bernardsilenou The way it works is that laboratories report test results through the DEMIS system. Therefore, it is technically still a report of a laboratory but a laboratory report via DEMIS, which SurvNet differentiates.

[leventegal-she]

Changing the labels in the translation files needs to be done via Crowdin

[AndyBakcsy-she]

Validated on the latest version of Sormas version 1.56.0 on https://test1402.sormas-oegd.de/sormas-ui/