Closed ktozdogan closed 1 year ago
This one I'm sort of on the fence about... they don't really do metagenomics as a whole analysis but on the flip side they do make their whole raw data available (for pop-gen :scream: ).
Could you post this on slack and get community opinion?
Definitely a metagenomics sample, and would argue a metagenomics paper. As you say, there was a Centrifuge analysis in addition to the pop-gen stuff. One could make a similar comment about pathogen metagenomics papers, where the primary focus is often phylogeography, locus presence/absence, selection, etc, rather than just a metagenomic community reconstruction. :wink:
@pheintzman
I agree with Pete that when the sample is metagenomic one, we should include it. Tthis is primarily a sediment sample, not some petrous bone. So we expect a similar signal as for a sediment sample that was studied for microbes and not mammals.
@alexhbnr
So we will include!
Publication DOI or URL
10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.023
Additional context
ENA: PRJEB41420