Open pengguo-seismo opened 5 years ago
Hi "Meatball",
Can you send me you example folder with you Par_file, script and everything so that I have a look?
Thank you,
Have a good day,
Alexis Bottero Marine Physical Laboratory Scripps Institution of Oceanography (+1) 619 677 9887 (+33) 695 170 097
Le mar. 26 mars 2019 à 07:32, meatball880207 notifications@github.com a écrit :
Dear Developers,
I am trying to use specfem2d for acoustic inversion, p_sv=.true., and Vs=0, for updating Vp. I have tried both the pressure wavefield and potential for adjoint source, however, neither gave converging results.
I use the same model for elastic inversion, and SH mode inversion, both of them works. So it is not because of the starting model I used. Any suggestions?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/1035, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGuO4mHY-eBguHSr9H-lO6b1qFKYfY0aks5vai-PgaJpZM4cLmSK .
Hi,
I have also encountered similar problem. I have noticed that adjoint sources for Z component does not contribute to the kernel. If you only give non-zero adjoint source to Z component, acoustic kernel comes as zero. I have setup a repo which replicates this for a simple case. https://github.com/rdno/specfem2d_kernel_test
Periodic boundaries are also change the sign of the kernel. If you want, I can provide an example.
Also, Hessian2 kernels come up as zero for acoustic simulation.
These are some of the problems I could identify.
Dear Developers,
I am trying to use specfem2d for acoustic inversion, p_sv=.true., and Vs=0, for updating Vp. I have tried both the pressure wavefield and potential for adjoint source, however, neither gave converging results.
I use the same model for elastic inversion, and SH mode inversion, both of them works. So it is not because of the starting model I used. Any suggestions?