SPECFEM / specfem2d

SPECFEM2D simulates forward and adjoint seismic wave propagation in two-dimensional acoustic, (an)elastic, poroelastic or coupled acoustic-(an)elastic-poroelastic media, with Convolution PML absorbing conditions.
GNU General Public License v3.0
204 stars 147 forks source link

specfem2d nightly build has failed #898

Closed buildbot-princeton closed 6 years ago

buildbot-princeton commented 6 years ago

See build 340 and PDFs.

komatits commented 6 years ago

That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.

On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:

See build 340 http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340 and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

luet commented 6 years ago

So should I disable the nightly test?

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.

On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:

See build 340 http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340 and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.

komatits commented 6 years ago

Hi David,

Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?

Thanks, Dimitri.

On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:

So should I disable the nightly test?

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.

On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:

See build 340

http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340

and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread

https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKc1jctEVIuuSgHnY9f-rn3L3YJFzks5thPMMgaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

luet commented 6 years ago

Sounds good to me. I am skilled at ignoring emails! David

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 9:09 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: "David J. Luet" luet@exchange.Princeton.EDU, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

Hi David,

Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?

Thanks, Dimitri.

On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:

So should I disable the nightly test?

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.

On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:

See build 340

http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340

and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread

https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKc1jctEVIuuSgHnY9f-rn3L3YJFzks5thPMMgaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659651, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TNQy4kyZziecbVF9WH6lJuEX_fE7ks5thPQJgaJpZM4S4Drv.

komatits commented 6 years ago

:-)

On 03/23/2018 02:10 PM, David Luet wrote:

Sounds good to me. I am skilled at ignoring emails! David

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 9:09 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: "David J. Luet" luet@exchange.Princeton.EDU, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

Hi David,

Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?

Thanks, Dimitri.

On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:

So should I disable the nightly test?

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.

On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:

See build 340

http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340

and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread

https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on

GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546,

or mute the

threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub

https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609,

or mute the thread

https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKc1jctEVIuuSgHnY9f-rn3L3YJFzks5thPMMgaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659651, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TNQy4kyZziecbVF9WH6lJuEX_fE7ks5thPQJgaJpZM4S4Drv.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659985, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKToNShkye8pm212JqWpSAOA1sRLWks5thPRWgaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

komatits commented 6 years ago

Fixed! I will commit the change in two minutes.

Dimitri.

On 03/23/2018 09:28 AM, Dimitri Komatitsch wrote:

That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.

On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:

See build 340 http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340 and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

komatits commented 6 years ago

Fixed! I will commit the change in two minutes. Turned out to be easier than I though.

Dimitri.

On 03/23/2018 02:10 PM, David Luet wrote:

Sounds good to me. I am skilled at ignoring emails! David

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 9:09 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: "David J. Luet" luet@exchange.Princeton.EDU, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

Hi David,

Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?

Thanks, Dimitri.

On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:

So should I disable the nightly test?

From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)

That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.

On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:

See build 340

http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340

and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread

https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on

GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546,

or mute the

threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub

https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609,

or mute the thread

https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKc1jctEVIuuSgHnY9f-rn3L3YJFzks5thPMMgaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659651, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TNQy4kyZziecbVF9WH6lJuEX_fE7ks5thPQJgaJpZM4S4Drv.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659985, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKToNShkye8pm212JqWpSAOA1sRLWks5thPRWgaJpZM4S4Drv.

-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr