Closed buildbot-princeton closed 6 years ago
That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.
On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:
See build 340 http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340 and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
So should I disable the nightly test?
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.
On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:
See build 340 http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340 and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.
Hi David,
Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?
Thanks, Dimitri.
On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:
So should I disable the nightly test?
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.
On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:
See build 340
http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340
and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKc1jctEVIuuSgHnY9f-rn3L3YJFzks5thPMMgaJpZM4S4Drv.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
Sounds good to me. I am skilled at ignoring emails! David
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 9:09 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: "David J. Luet" luet@exchange.Princeton.EDU, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
Hi David,
Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?
Thanks, Dimitri.
On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:
So should I disable the nightly test?
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.
On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:
See build 340
http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340
and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TO_soVmjYXxxnDsKby3ZsSTQvqcTks5thLI0gaJpZM4S4Drv.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKc1jctEVIuuSgHnY9f-rn3L3YJFzks5thPMMgaJpZM4S4Drv.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659651, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TNQy4kyZziecbVF9WH6lJuEX_fE7ks5thPQJgaJpZM4S4Drv.
:-)
On 03/23/2018 02:10 PM, David Luet wrote:
Sounds good to me. I am skilled at ignoring emails! David
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 9:09 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: "David J. Luet" luet@exchange.Princeton.EDU, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
Hi David,
Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?
Thanks, Dimitri.
On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:
So should I disable the nightly test?
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.
On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:
See build 340
http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340
and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on
GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546,
or mute the
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609,
or mute the thread
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659651, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TNQy4kyZziecbVF9WH6lJuEX_fE7ks5thPQJgaJpZM4S4Drv.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659985, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKToNShkye8pm212JqWpSAOA1sRLWks5thPRWgaJpZM4S4Drv.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
Fixed! I will commit the change in two minutes.
Dimitri.
On 03/23/2018 09:28 AM, Dimitri Komatitsch wrote:
That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.
On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:
See build 340 http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340 and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKaSCPYgLDLgZONuLRu9kKRFu5seaks5thFcigaJpZM4S4Drv.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
Fixed! I will commit the change in two minutes. Turned out to be easier than I though.
Dimitri.
On 03/23/2018 02:10 PM, David Luet wrote:
Sounds good to me. I am skilled at ignoring emails! David
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 9:09 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: "David J. Luet" luet@exchange.Princeton.EDU, Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
Hi David,
Probably not, we need to fix it on Tuesday or Wednesday, we can probably just ignore the few automatic emails we will get in between?
Thanks, Dimitri.
On 03/23/2018 02:05 PM, David Luet wrote:
So should I disable the nightly test?
From: Dimitri Komatitsch notifications@github.com Reply-To: geodynamics/specfem2d reply@reply.github.com Date: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM To: geodynamics/specfem2d specfem2d@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [geodynamics/specfem2d] specfem2d nightly build has failed (#898)
That's the AXISYM example that fails (after committing Zhinan's new viscoelastic PMLs). We know how to fix that, but haven't had time yet. Will do that next week.
On 03/23/2018 03:00 AM, buildbot-princeton wrote:
See build 340
http://specfem2d-buildbot.princeton.edu/builders/specfem2d_nightly/builds/340
and PDFs http://seismobot.princeton.edu/nightly_build_pdf/specfem2d/.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898, or mute the thread
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on
GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375578546,
or mute the
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375658609,
or mute the thread
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659651, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFY0TNQy4kyZziecbVF9WH6lJuEX_fE7ks5thPQJgaJpZM4S4Drv.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem2d/issues/898#issuecomment-375659985, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKToNShkye8pm212JqWpSAOA1sRLWks5thPRWgaJpZM4S4Drv.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
See build 340 and PDFs.