Closed EtienneBachmann closed 7 years ago
Hi all,
Etienne's recent bug fixes maybe/likely fixed this small bug as well (?). @EtienneBachmann
Cheers, Dimitri.
Hi Dimitri,
My last commit didn't fix it, but I guess that instead of implementing it, we should print an error message like " Adjoint simulations not supported with .bin format, please use SU instead".
I'll do it soon.
Best,
Etienne
Hi Etienne,
I agree, good idea :-) I will then accept the pull request.
Thanks, Best,
Dimitri.
On 06/05/2017 07:13 PM, EtienneBachmann wrote:
Hi Dimitri,
My last commit didn't fix it, but I guess that instead of implementing it, we should print an error message like " Adjoint simulations not supported with .bin format, please use SU instead".
I'll do it soon.
Best,
Etienne
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/geodynamics/specfem3d/issues/487#issuecomment-306247123, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFjDKTCgbXKcX13jIO7F0KrK4H-nNasKks5sBDdPgaJpZM4EAPqe.
-- Dimitri Komatitsch, CNRS Research Director (DR CNRS) Laboratory of Mechanics and Acoustics, Marseille, France http://komatitsch.free.fr
Fixed by Etienne @EtienneBachmann
Hello everybody, There is currently an error for adjoint simulations with flags SU_FORMAT=.false. and SEISMOGRAMS_BINARY = .true. When checking the size of the seismo binary files in "setup_source_receivers" and reading adjoint source in "compute_array_sources", the code is not written to manage binary files. Is it a planned future work? Thanks