But we often have vocabularies that do not hold an rdfs:label or an rdfs:comment-triple. Instead it is very common to use dublin-core-relations to describe a vocabulary.
for label: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title (= dc:title) and/or http://purl.org/dc/terms/title (= dct:title)
for description: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/description (= dc:description)
As I like to prevent adding triples by hand, it would be great if you could implement this alternative options for holding information on label/description. The order could be:
In GitLab by @KlausIllmayer on Jun 18, 2021, 14:32
Currently, when creating a new vocabulary the label is taken from the rdfs:label-triple and the description is expected in the rdfs:comment-triple (see https://gitlab.gwdg.de/sshoc/sshoc-marketplace-backend/-/blob/develop/src/main/java/eu/sshopencloud/marketplace/services/vocabularies/rdf/RDFModelParser.java#L41)
But we often have vocabularies that do not hold an rdfs:label or an rdfs:comment-triple. Instead it is very common to use dublin-core-relations to describe a vocabulary.
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title
(= dc:title) and/orhttp://purl.org/dc/terms/title
(= dct:title)http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/description
(= dc:description)As I like to prevent adding triples by hand, it would be great if you could implement this alternative options for holding information on label/description. The order could be: