Open dpancic opened 3 years ago
In GitLab by @vronk on Sep 3, 2021, 14:35
do we want to have all the URIs available in also in the vocabulary as ingested in MP? @tparkola can we have multiple URIs per concept?
In GitLab by @vronk on Oct 25, 2021, 15:25
Could we simply change the URIs http => https
directly in the system?
Would that have any side-effects?
In GitLab by @vronk on Jan 31, 2022, 15:45
@KlausIllmayer, the vocabulary seems still to have http
.
Also in the vocab metadat poolparty
links are used. Looks strange. needed?
In GitLab by @KlausIllmayer on Apr 14, 2021, 15:06
Currently, the vocabulary
software-license
(https://marketplace-api.sshopencloud.eu/api/vocabularies/software-license) has http-URIs to spdx.@vronk Could you deliver this vocabulary with https-URIs? It looks like spdx already switched to https so it would be better to change the
concepts[]->uri
-field to https (not sure aboutconcepts[]->code
- could there be side effects when changing it to https?). But when looking into the ttl of the vocabulary (https://gitlab.gwdg.de/sshoc/sshoc-marketplace-backend/-/raw/develop/src/main/resources/initial-data/ignored/vocabularies/software-license.ttl) I see that the object-URL is used for code and for uri. So both will be changed.In general, it seems to me that
rdfs:seeAlso
would fit more for theconcepts[]->uri
-field (rdfs:seeAlso points directly to the license e.g.rdfs:seeAlso "https://opensource.org/licenses/AGPL-3.0", "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.txt";
forhttp://spdx.org/licenses/AGPL-3.0
). But there could be also more than one uri as the example shows, not sure, if this is currently possible. @vronk what is you opinion on this?