Open bradystroud opened 2 years ago
wicksipedia
commented
2 years ago Hey @bradystroud Some of us had a discussion last night about aligning more with https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/azure-best-practices/resource-naming which should make things easier to maintain.
Hey @lukecookssw maybe the exception for storage accounts should be called out since it is a common one
tiagov8
commented
1 year ago Hey @bradystroud
Could this issue be closed?
bradystroud
commented
1 year ago Hey @tiagov8
No - still an issue I would prefer this rule to reccomend following Microsoft's reccomendations rather than our own format that we will need to maintain as per @wicksipedia 's suggestion
This probably wont be actioned but I'll keep the issue here as a 'for the record'
Cc: @adamcogan @pierssinclairssw @matt-goldman @wicksipedia @brydeno
Hi @lukecookssw,
https://www.ssw.com.au/rules/azure-naming-resources
This naming convention wont work in some scenarios. There is a plan for the exceptions section but it doesn't actually explain how to plan for exceptions.
The rule should suggest how to handle exceptions, or not suggest a naming convention at all. Not suggesting a naming convention would make this rule easier to maintain.