Closed lacinoire closed 3 years ago
Hi @lacinoire
The PR looks great to me and can be merged. (I don't have rights to merge) Regards Matias
Looks like there are common commits with #87 Would be possible to remove them in order to split the fix/feat into two distinct pull-requests? If not, we might close #87 and merge this one. Thank you! :smile:
I cherry picked the last commit and now there are no overlaps with #87 anymore 🙂
(includes / dependent on #87)
Good afternoon 😊
For Test Cube I needed more detailed coverage information, specifically the instruction coverage reported per method. I adapted my modifications to fit @martinezmatias new coverage transformers and added an option to specify which coverage transformer should be used.
Included a test for the new method-detailed coverage and a more general test to help me understand the comparison of two coverages.