Closed nicholasjhorton closed 5 months ago
@Casey308 to review Tyler's work
There is a line (line 296) in chapter 20 that I was not sure was a footnote. And if it is, I am not sure how I would go about fixing it. Any guidance or opinion as to how we should address it would be much appreciated. 43f016a
Similarly, for chapter 22, on line 1013 there is a 1 (presumably representing a footnote), however there is no footnote that corresponds to it. I will need to know if we are either missing a footnote here or if the scan just copied an extra 1 here.
Based on looking in the PDF of the book it doesn't look like the chapter 20 one is a footnote, but the one in chapter 22 is. I've attached the footnote in question, so maybe we can just copy it from the PDF manually
It seems that Nick and Justin have been putting the footnotes in brackets on a new line, but I don't think you did that Tyler. I don't know if that matters, but it may be helpful to stay consistent.
@Casey308 I don't think that it's necessary to start a new line with the footnote, though it may be something to confirm as we finalize our workflow.
PS I'm investigating the issues in chapters 20 and 22...
Here's my proposed fix for chapter 20: can you please review @tknightly24?
@Casey308 thanks for the screenshot: that was most helpful!
@tknightly24 here's my proposed fix: https://github.com/STAT325-S24/HistoryAmherstCollege/commit/b93e961c4ce327af268f5df7f61e84daef083807
This all looks good. I think we can close this issue now unless there were any lingering questions.
This issue will be closed when someone has updated the footnotes in these chapters and someone else has reviewed the pull request.