Peer-Review HW 04 for zjbthomas

Peer Review 4 for zjbthomas

Topic	Excellent	Satisfactory
Coding style	:heavy_check_mark:
Coding strategy	:heavy_check_mark:
Presentation: graphs		:heavy_check_mark:
Presentation: tables	:heavy_check_mark:
Achievement, creativity	:heavy_check_mark:
Ease of access	:heavy_check_mark:

Remarks:

Coding style: Code is well commented. Good use of informative variable names. You have gone beyond what was expected and required! I learned a lot from your other functions part. Well done 👍
Coding strategy: Usage of all functions are well illustrated. Code is efficient, correct, and minimal. Exploration and interpretation are made to compare the similar functions, such as complete() and expand().
Presentation: graphs: Good interpretation of the output graph. It would have been helpful if you could add a title to the output graph next time. For example.

labs(x = " ", y = " ", 
       title = " ") +
  theme(plot.title = element_text(size = 12))

Presentation: tables: Good use of kable! Good interpretation of the output table. I learned how to add styling to a table by using kableExtra::kable_styling(full_width = T).
Achievement, creativity and Ease of access: Easy for me to navigate to your repo from README.md, However, it's a good choice to make your .md file more navigatable next time!

---
title: " "
author: " "
date: "13th October, 2018"
output:
  github_document:
    toc: yes
---

Overall, great job! 🥇