Closed aremazeilles closed 2 years ago
If I remember well, we put protocol 1 because we saw it as the standard to follow. Effectively, we expect that other partners (EMG, cognitive,...) will follow the numbering.
Could you check with the colleagues of the group will provide their code? It starts to be critical. ping @LorisR
I would assume the management of the other protocols is independent from this code, so I would suggest to close this issue
The code currently provides PI for protocol 1. Is it expected to extend it with other PIs for other protocol?