Open DanNixon opened 1 week ago
Did some minor error handling improvements.
Is this intended to be called from a yet to be made binary? Or will this crate eventually be converted into one? In the former case the functions should return Results rather than panic before I approve, but in the latter case, I can approve as I imagine error handling would be done later.
Did some minor error handling improvements.
Since this code will only ever be used within tests it is technically exempt from the error handling style rules, although the changes are still for the better.
Is this intended to be called from a yet to be made binary?
It will be used by a suite of integration tests. It does not necessarily need to be it's own crate, that is just the route I went with in Satori. On second consideration it is probably a better idea to just have this code inside the crate that will contain the tests.
Note that this is still work in progress (indicated by being a draft PR) please avoid modifying it for the time being.
Summary of changes
Adds a barebones testing utility crate (mostly stolen from Satori).
Resolves #253
Instruction for review/testing