Closed erwango closed 1 week ago
Hello Erwan, is this something to be done by people who are releasing the Cube firmware? @orazioprivitera
Hello Erwan, is this something to be done by people who are releasing the Cube firmware? @orazioprivitera
I guess, yes.
ST Internal Reference: 189879
Hello @erwango,
We have received feedback from our development teams. Unfortunately, they have indicated that changing the driver/CMSIS naming convention at this stage would significantly impact backward compatibility and incur considerable effort. This change would need to be applied across the Cube SW package drivers, related documentation, and the STM32CubeMX tool integration.
Therefore, they suggest adapting the scripts to handle the single digit for STM32CubeWB0.
Thank you for your understanding. Best Regards,
Thanks for the feedback @TOUNSTM.
From what I understood there was also a good reason to make it this way as STM32WB0 variants use a single digit number (STM32WB07 for instance) while other series use 2 digits for variant naming (STM32WBA55 for instance).
Hence this single x
makes actual sense and it is not just a fantasy.
We'll adapt our scripts to this possible use case.
Describe the bug
STM32WB0 driver files are named
stm32wb0x_hal_adc.h
while according to STM32Cube convention isstm32wb0xx_hal_adc.h
(mind the doublex
). See for instance stm32wbaxx_hal_adc.hSame for
cmsis_device_wb0/Include
files while aslo miss ax
Impact
Scripts based environments used to existing STM32Cube convention should add specific treatment for WB0.