Closed scachemaille closed 3 years ago
Hi @scachemaille,
Thank you for this report.
Indeed, the comment are inverted and they should rather be:
-*#define LL_TIM_ONEPULSEMODE_SINGLE TIM_CR1_OPM /*!< Counter is not stopped at update event */
+*#define LL_TIM_ONEPULSEMODE_SINGLE TIM_CR1_OPM /*!< Counter stops counting at the next update event*/
-*#define LL_TIM_ONEPULSEMODE_REPETITIVE 0x00000000U /*!< Counter stops counting at the next update event*/
+*#define LL_TIM_ONEPULSEMODE_REPETITIVE 0x00000000U /*!< Counter is not stopped at update event */
A bug tracker has been opened internally and the fix will be published in the frame of a future publication. We cannot share a date for the moment. Stay tuned and thank you once more for your contribution and for your patience.
With regards,
ST Internal Reference: 96303
Hi @scachemaille,
I hope you are fine. The issue you reported has been fixed in the frame of version v1.2.1 of the stm32g4xx_hal_driver published recently on GitHub.
Thank you again for having reported.
With regards,
https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/stm32g4xx_hal_driver/blob/8b4518417706d42eef5c14e56a650005abf478a8/Inc/stm32g4xx_ll_tim.h#L608-L609
I think that the comment on these lines are actually inverted..