Open UditSinghParihar opened 5 years ago
Hi, thanks for this very detailed report.
Do you have a repo I can access to look at your changes ?
Hi,
Yes I have forked your repo, you can see the changes here .
Thanks, I will try to have a look asap. I'm very busy these days but hopefully I can have a look early next week.
get access to the final pair of quadrilaterals selected by you algorithm(and possibly visualize them too)
It is a very important feature and we are currently working on it, hopefully we should release a software a GUI to check the algorithm output. I will check your code as well, and see if we can merge it to master.
like prior information of Rotation-translation
Extending pairs filtering is easy to do, by implementing a dedicated filter inheriting gr::PairFilterConcept
.
As you can see here, gr::FunctorSuper4PCS
takes a filter template parameter, that is then used in the different algorithm to filter invalid pairs.
Note there are already options in the code to set the maximum angular and translation motion (see declaration at matchBase.h:106
, and use at algorithms/PointPairFilter.h:105,114
). It is just that they are not wired to the CLI.
I would be glad to implement these features myself, since this library is very useful for our purposes where we are dealing with high viewpoint variations.
A simple thing you can do is to update the file demos/demo-utils.h
to load and set the fields max_color_distance
and max_angle
.
Hello sir, I am trying to visualize the corresponding bases selected by Super4pcs in input and output PointCloud, for debugging purposes and extending this library for a segmentation network. I have made following changes in the code:-
base_
andcurrent_congruent_
are the data members that hold the indices of points consisting of the bases in the input and output PointClouds after final iteration, (from here). So I make them public members in the derived class Match4pcsBase(shown here).demos/Super4PCS/super4pcs_test.cc
(shown here). And printing these 3D points to the terminal (shown here).My question is: Are the bases really non-corresponding in this scenario or I have made some wrong assumptions of the data members storing final bases coordinates. Please let me know how can I access the final bases and possibly change them at the starting point itself.
Thanks