Open FlorisFokkinga opened 1 year ago
.
@FlorisFokkinga @baszoetekouw If a User reject an AUP, then he / she will be asked to agree every time he / she accesses SBS and also if he tries to connect directly to the service because of the login in the proxy_authz
endpoint logic called by eduTeams. This is the desired behaviour?
I think that if a user rejects the AUP, they need to be removed from the CO. So they would only get the AUP question again if they rejoin the CO, I think?
Ok. I assume we also need to change the attached screen that is shown when a user logs in and there are updated AUP's? It is not logical to display this as a dialog with the CO as a background, as the user could have used a bookmark and is heading to a different page.
And do we need to change the welcome dialog shown if a user joins a CO?
@oharsta You are right about the other screens. The plan was to first solve the complicated case of multiple reset AUPs over multiple COs. I expected that solution to also work for the simpler cases. If you think it's better to fix those as well at the same time, and there's a logical solution for those cases, please feel free to do so. 🙂
@oharsta do you have enough information to implement this, or do we need to expand on the UI?
Enough information. Just didn't get round to.
In principle, this is a good thing to do and aligns with values around user autonomy and privacy. In practice, this is probably not something users actually care about. They will click the green button and get to work.
Further -- in future, we will put effort into reducing the number of AUPs we throw at users, so adjusting our principles for AUPs. So for now, let's not put effort into this.
The redesign for the changed AUP screen.
First screen
The checkbox label should say:
I agree to this acceptable use policy.
Ik ga akkoord met deze acceptable use policy.
Modal, in case not all AUPs are accepted