Open MaximilianMeister opened 7 years ago
We can't have a caasp-ctl and a caaspctl. That overloading of CLI terms is... not good. So, my opinion here is no.
@ajaeger - Before a decision is made on this, it's important to understand the scope of this change:
I'd rather see us continue to focus on defects than this rename. It will require several people and a few days to make it through the system.
+1 for renaming this project to caaspctl. It will make it more user friendly. I don't see any problems with renaming it.
coming up in the discussion of https://github.com/kubic-project/automation/pull/148 can we rename it to
caaspctl
(like all other tools, kubectl, etcdctl, systemctl ...) preferrably before releasing2.0
?