Open acossio opened 4 months ago
Note: see #23 when working on this issue, to think about what will go in Sites vs Quarto website
Are we abandoning the Inside SWFSC site? I'm fine with that. Just keep that bare minimum. I think we only want to really build one website. We could point the Sites website to the Github one. I'm open to ideas.
Yea I agree with the for the glider lab, basically just using Sites to point to the GitHub/Quarto one. But it should be something that we keep in mind as we build out the GitHub/Quarto site, ie making sure that there's nothing that it truly makes sense to leave in Sites. (I don't think there will be, again just a keep in mind)
Moving everything to the Github site. Considering this closed.
Hey @acossio, if it's ok with you I'd like to leave this open, as a reminder to myself to both 1) point from the Sites pages to the GitHub site and 2) generally clean up what is on the Sites pages so that there's no info duplicated from GitHub. Does that make sense to you?
That is fine with me.
Build out the official ESD glider website. https://sites.google.com/noaa.gov/inside-swfsc/divisions/esd/gliders?authuser=0.