Closed edechter closed 8 years ago
I think the definition is more according to:
is_of_type(positive_integer, 2.2)
false.
or actually, just ... just plain integer
is more accurate.
Yes, and I think that's as it should be, given between/3. But if that's the intention the documentation should be updated to reflect that.
Hi @edechter,
I believe this was recently updated. Can you check whether this now looks fine to you?
between(IntL,IntU)
: Integer [IntL..IntU]
between(FloatL,FloatU)
: Number [FloatL..FloatU]`
Yes, it looks fine to me now.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 1, 2016, at 5:46 PM, Wouter Beek notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi @edechter,
I believe this was recently updated. Can you check whether this now looks fine to you?
between(IntL,IntU): Integer [IntL..IntU] between(FloatL,FloatU): Number [FloatL..FloatU]`
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
Documentation specifies that
between(L, U)
is the type ofnumber
between L and U. But: