Open eduardo-rodrigues opened 2 years ago
The initial version had that: the variable {shorthand} for the work package entries equals to WP 5
etc.
However, it looked a bit cluttered.
It is just my opinion. Not for me to decide. But then in alphabetic order makes more sense IMO ...
(BTW, while at it, the overview page has a "[Home page]({{ .Site.Home.Permalink }})." displayed. Should be a trivial fix for the next commit or batch of commits.)
Overall the site is nice and clean 👍.
Overview page has been fixed, minipage on workpackages is now a numbered list:
@davidecostanzo should we change order of work packages?
Current:
Proposed:
Analysis Systems
Event generators
Intelligent data and workflow management
Reconstruction and trigger
Simulation
Since it will move Eduardo's and mine WP from last to first, we cannot make a decision on that ;).
We previously had
WP1: Intelligent data and workflow management
WP2: Event generators
WP3: Simulation
WP4: Reconstruction and trigger
WP5: Analysis Systems
But that was rejected due to clutter.
If we want to keep it as is → issue can be closed.
Hi Luke, sure, go ahead if you prefer. Sorry, I should have reacted to this earlier.
Thanks for sorting the typo. I was planning to do a bit of an update to the webpage in the coming days.
Cheers Davide
It seems unnatural not to list the WPs in alphabetic order. I undestand that's because the list follows the WP number. In that case, better to write "WP1 - ..." or something similar.
Same comment for the "minipage" on the homepage on "Work Packages".