Add OAuth, biospecimen type compatibility, update UI

[Aryllen]

This is fairly big update. There is a test application here that's currently set to the amp-ad config. Note that there were some test studies that had metadata files uploaded with two different species. I updated them to have the same species. Note that these test files would have failed to validate in the current version of dccmonitor due to this and still will.

• Add OAuth to app. Set up similarly to dccvalidator with .Renviron.
• Make compatible with dccvalidator's latest version, which includes biospecimen types. Note that any biospecimen metadata files in the active folder should be updated with the appropriate biospecimenType annotation. The table dccmonitor pulls from needs the biospecimenType column added. This has been done for AD since I have access to it and was testing on it.
• Allow more freedom on table columns. There must still be columns such as id, assay, metadataType, species, study, modifiedOn, biospecimenType (if the config has biospecimen types). However, the rest of the columns are optional, allowing you to add any extra columns wanted or reordering the columns by editing the file view schema.
• Change the UI. Instead of a sidepanel that populates with the study names, there's an alphabetically ordered dropdown box to select from. Once a study is selected, the information pops up. The dropdown is inactive until logged in and populated with study names.
• Update config using @kelshmo's PR #117. I'll close that PR since it's now included in this one.

Fixed the tests (outside of Mac dev since there appear to be some packages not cached/available for that OS, yet). ~Tests are failing due to an oddity with dccvalidator. 🤔 I'll check into it. The test app is working, though.~

[avanlinden]

I like the new UI with the menu bar rather than the side menu!

When I test-validated some old studies in the test version of the app you linked, I noticed that I was back to getting an error for the grant value in the manifest. Do we need to change the AD annotations table in dccmonitor to be the AD-specific on, e.g. this PR: https://github.com/Sage-Bionetworks/dccvalidator/pull/507#issue-699873470?

[Aryllen]

Yes. Good point, @avanlinden! I'll update that.