Final changes before the meeting

[Zune-Ahmed]

1. added a dedication page and moved the authors words
2. sorted the names in alphabetical order
3. added asterisks to the names that have not yet submitted their review/work

[Samuel-Lubliner]

• Having two acknowledgements in the table of contents looks a bit clunky. I propose our shared acknowledgement (Zune and Sam) go in the acknowledgement section with the names of the reviewers and proof readers and Prof Colman's note remain in the preface. Another option is to use multiple preface tags with title tags. The multiple preface tags will appear in the table of contents with what ever title we give them. See: Section 4.24: Front Matter https://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-front-matter.html

• We should use appropriate tags if we would like to bold text. Author names should not use the term tag. This is considered tag abuse. See: terminology https://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-paragraphs.html#topic-paragraphs-3-10

• I do not believe dedication is a fitting tag for our acknowledgement so I changed it back to acknowledgement.

• Moving forward, descriptive branch names are helpful. "A short, descriptive branch name enables your collaborators to see ongoing work at a glance". See https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-github/github-flow

[hcolmanccc]

I agree that dedication is not the right word. Maybe Foreword? But separate section looks good to me. If you want to put it back in the acknowledgement section, should be in a subsection or something - your words are very different than the general acknowledgment to the people that did some work for us (and it is from all of us).

In any case, the preface should go first in the table of contents since it introduces what the book is.

On Aug 26, 2024, at 12:26 PM, Samuel Lubliner @.***> wrote:

This message is from an external sender. Please do not open unexpected links or attachments.

I'm not sure I agree with all of these changes.

• Having two acknowledgements in the table of contents looks a bit clunky. I propose our shared acknowledgement (Zune and Sam) go in the acknowledgement section and Prof Colman's note remain in the preface. I think this makes per the docs. See: Subsection 4.24.6: (*) Acknowledgementshttps://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-front-matter.html#topic-front-matter-8 https://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-front-matter.html#topic-front-matter-8

• We should use appropriate tags if we would like to bold text. Author names should not use the term tag. This is considered tag abuse. See: , terminology, larvaehttps://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-paragraphs.html#topic-paragraphs-3-10 https://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-paragraphs.html#topic-paragraphs-3-10

• I do not believe dedication is a fitting tag for our acknowledgement so I changed it back to acknowledgement.

• Moving forward, descriptive branch names are helpful. "A short, descriptive branch name enables your collaborators to see ongoing work at a glance". See https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-github/github-flow

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SageMathOER-CCC/sage-discrete-math/pull/99#issuecomment-2310703486, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BFJZLUQQIJMLDRTEBEIA44LZTNQLRAVCNFSM6AAAAABNCG3GJ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJQG4YDGNBYGY. You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: @.***>

Hellen Colman, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Wilbur Wright College 4300 N. Narragansett Chicago, IL 60634

@.*** hellencolman.com/mathhttps://www.hellencolman.com/math

[hcolmanccc]

Actually something like “From student authors” seems like a very descriptive tag for what you wrote - instead of dedication.

In any case, please deploy whatever you have ready before the meeting, so we look at the last version together.

On Aug 26, 2024, at 12:53 PM, Hellen Colman @.***> wrote:

I agree that dedication is not the right word. Maybe Foreword? But separate section looks good to me. If you want to put it back in the acknowledgement section, should be in a subsection or something - your words are very different than the general acknowledgment to the people that did some work for us (and it is from all of us).

In any case, the preface should go first in the table of contents since it introduces what the book is.

On Aug 26, 2024, at 12:26 PM, Samuel Lubliner @.***> wrote:

This message is from an external sender. Please do not open unexpected links or attachments.

I'm not sure I agree with all of these changes.

• Having two acknowledgements in the table of contents looks a bit clunky. I propose our shared acknowledgement (Zune and Sam) go in the acknowledgement section and Prof Colman's note remain in the preface. I think this makes per the docs. See: Subsection 4.24.6: (*) Acknowledgementshttps://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-front-matter.html#topic-front-matter-8 https://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-front-matter.html#topic-front-matter-8

• We should use appropriate tags if we would like to bold text. Author names should not use the term tag. This is considered tag abuse. See: , terminology, larvaehttps://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-paragraphs.html#topic-paragraphs-3-10 https://pretextbook.org/doc/guide/html/topic-paragraphs.html#topic-paragraphs-3-10

• I do not believe dedication is a fitting tag for our acknowledgement so I changed it back to acknowledgement.

• Moving forward, descriptive branch names are helpful. "A short, descriptive branch name enables your collaborators to see ongoing work at a glance". See https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-github/github-flow

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SageMathOER-CCC/sage-discrete-math/pull/99#issuecomment-2310703486, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BFJZLUQQIJMLDRTEBEIA44LZTNQLRAVCNFSM6AAAAABNCG3GJ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJQG4YDGNBYGY. You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: @.***>

Hellen Colman, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Wilbur Wright College 4300 N. Narragansett Chicago, IL 60634

@.*** hellencolman.com/mathhttps://www.hellencolman.com/math

Hellen Colman, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Wilbur Wright College 4300 N. Narragansett Chicago, IL 60634

@.*** hellencolman.com/mathhttps://www.hellencolman.com/math