[circle-quantizer] Separate quantization functionalities from circle2circle

[jinevening]

Currently, quantization is supported by circle2circle, which not only performs quantization but also various optimizations. To keep the tool smaller and simpler, it would be better to make a separate tool for quantization.

For this, following things must be done.

• [x] 1. Remove the codes related to quantization from circle2circle #2621

• [x] 2. Update quantize function in luci (quantize should be revised for being called alone) #2629

• [x] 3. Introduce a new executable circle-quantizer #2645

• [x] 4. Update pota-quantization-value-test #2668

[seanshpark]

It's OK if you go 3 and then 1

[jinevening]

@seanshpark I think 1-2-3 is the way to do this task with the least number of steps. 3 must be done after 2 (otherwise, the circle-quantizer will not pass luci::validate). And it is better to do 2 after 1 (2 may affect the current circle2circle).

[seanshpark]

Have to thought of the name for this? circlequantizer ?

[jinevening]

Have to thought of the name for this? circlequantizer ?

I've thought about that, but circle-quantizer seems easier to read. Is there a reason not to use -?

[seanshpark]

Is there a reason not to use -?

Nope, circle-quantizer is OK. Personally I'm not used to seeing - in file names :) may be because - are used for options... sometimes seen using _ but typing this requires to type on SHIFT...

[jinevening]

@seanshpark I got it. For now, I will use circle-quantizer for the consistency with circle-inspect, circle-verify, etc. I will avoid using _ as much as possible :)

[jinevening]

I close this issue because all tasks were done.