search

SanKumar2015 / EST-coaps

EST over CoAPs IETF draft
1 stars 1 forks source link

Adam R.'s IESG DISCUSS and COMMENTS #156

Closed csosto-pk closed 4 years ago

csosto-pk commented 4 years ago

DISCUSS:

Thanks for the work that the authors and working group put into this document. I have one DISCUSS-level comment that should be very easy to resolve, and a small number of editorial nits.

§9:

Since this specification is adding new endpoints under /.well-known/est, it needs to update the "Well-Known URIs" registry so that the entry for "est" indicates this document (in addition to RFC 7030).

That is a good point. We will make sure we add this in the IANA considerations.

csosto-pk commented 4 years ago

COMMENT:

§5.3:

The Content-Format (HTTP Media-Type equivalent) of the CoAP message

HTTP doesn't have a "Media-Type" field. Presumably this intends to say "Content-Type"?

[pvds] s/(HTTP Media-Type equivalent)/(see section 5.5.1 of RFC7252)/

§5.3:

Media-Types specified in the HTTP Content-Type header (Section 3.2.2

Nit "...header field..."

§5.5:

HTTP response code 202 with a Retry-After header in [RFC7030] has no

Nit "...header field..."

[pvds] s/header/ header field/

csosto-pk commented 4 years ago

Changes committed in https://github.com/SanKumar2015/EST-coaps/commit/662752d2a725ee72a75af70c36a6379b5cc2d4ab

csosto-pk commented 4 years ago

From Adam 1/6/2019

Thanks for addressing my discuss and comments!

csosto-pk commented 4 years ago

Uploaded in v-18