Closed tpzou closed 5 months ago
Hi, @Sangminhong. Thank you for your excellent work!
I would like to ask some questions about ShapeNet data during training and test data processing:
1. I noticed in the article that incomplete point clouds are obtained by projection and I tried to use pytorch3d for the corresponding operation. But I would still like to know your corresponding code to avoid errors. 2. Is the point cloud data normalized? 3. The chamfer loss in the code seems to be different from the usual one (with the addition of `torch.sqrt()`).
Sorry for the late reply.
Hope I answered your questions properly. If you have more issues, feel free to ask. Thank you
@Sangminhong , thank you for your reply. Is the incomplete point cloud at the beginning of the training also generated using 'sythesize(pcs_input, R)' function? For a fair comparison, can you provide the .h5 file that can be used directly in the data.py file (NetDataset function)? The incomplete point cloud I generated had poor results on the pre-trained network.
@Sangminhong , thank you for your reply. Is the incomplete point cloud at the beginning of the training also generated using 'sythesize(pcs_input, R)' function? For a fair comparison, can you provide the .h5 file that can be used directly in the data.py file (NetDataset function)? The incomplete point cloud I generated had poor results on the pre-trained network.
Yes we used the same function. If you send me an email to mchiash2@snu.ac.kr , I will give the .h5 file. Thank you
For people who need the .h5 file, please download it from https://github.com/eldar/differentiable-point-clouds as it is mentioned. We followed the same process and it is quite simple. After that if you still have issues, please let me know. Thank you
Hi, @Sangminhong. Thank you for your excellent work!
I would like to ask some questions about ShapeNet data during training and test data processing:
torch.sqrt()
).