search

SanteonNL / shared-care-planning

https://santeonnl.github.io/shared-care-planning/
GNU General Public License v3.0
4 stars 3 forks source link

plan definition with different classification systems #41

Open joostholslag opened 2 months ago

joostholslag commented 2 months ago

How do you handle different classification systems (omaha/nanda/mikzo/ICF etc) in a shared plan definition? my solution was a specialisation (subclassing) pattern with both Omaha and nanda/nic/noc as children af a generic plan element (plan definition?) It does add a lot of complexity though.

jorritspee commented 1 month ago

At the moment the use of PlanDefinitions is not in scope. A pattern in which a network-oriented CarePlan acts as a parent for several organization-oriented CarePlans can already be supported.

bramwesselo commented 1 month ago

I think we changed this in the last couple of weeks; PlanDefinitions and ActivityDefinitions were mentioned in an effort to be as 'IHE DCP-compliant' as possible. However, currently out-of-scope because we're not doing anything with these definition-resources and yes, even 'simple' definition-instances can add a lot of complexity. You're, of course, free to use PlanDefinitions and ActivityDefinitions, but it's not part of SCP.