Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
It was not created by snip.
New code added to support VMAD in 3.0.28 has some serious performance issues,
you can feel it for example when browsing quests group in skyrim.esm. Yes VMAD
subrecords are huge and take time to parse, but should not be the reason for
such major slowdown. Now it feels like 10x times slower... :(
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2013 at 7:35
Running a profiling, but out of debugging it took ~20 minutes, during debugging
and with profiling it has run for 45 minutes and it is not done.
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2013 at 10:55
Finally took 54 minutes. At first glance, I would say I need to optimize
MergeStorage...
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2013 at 11:09
Attachments:
Tried with 3.0.27 (prior to vmad update) and it halts too. Why the hell noone
ever noticed that performance issue in the past.
The only logical answer is because More Interactive Items.ESM overrides around
10000 of vanilla references, which is unheard even for large mods or dlcs.
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2013 at 6:20
If I don't "MemorySort" etSubRecord, etSubRecordStruct, etSubRecordUnion,
etStruct, etValue, etFlag, etStringListTerminator and etUnion I am down to ~1'
in debugger.
If I add back etSubRecord to the sorted elements, it rises up to more than 30' !
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 19 Feb 2013 at 10:08
The reason for this is because switching an ESP to an ESM will trigger the
generation of the ONAM subrecords when the file is saved. This has been a
normal and accepted cause for the delay in the past, though perhaps something
is greatly slowing it down for Skyrim.
Something to look at anyway.
Original comment by arthmoor
on 26 Feb 2013 at 3:07
executor115@hotmail.com : Did you try with 3.0.29 ?
Hoping to close...
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 20 Mar 2013 at 8:31
Yeah, definitely saving very quickly now. Problem resolved, thank you.
Original comment by executor...@hotmail.com
on 1 Apr 2013 at 4:05
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 1 Apr 2013 at 7:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
executor...@hotmail.com
on 11 Feb 2013 at 5:19