Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Did some investigation of this.
Changing these values to 00 00 00 00 makes it so the weight slider on the armor
doesn't work at all for both male and female, so the CK and game use the 100
weight model on the actor, such that there is an air-gap at the body/headmesh
boundary for actors of weight less than 100.
Setting the value to 00 02 00 00 fixes the issue with the female model
Setting the value to 02 00 00 00 fixes the issue with the male model
setting the value to 02 02 00 00 fixes both
So I would say for that 'Unknown' field:
02 - Enable weight slider - Male
02 - Enable weight slider - female
00 - Unknown
00 - Unknown
Making a copy of an ARMA in the CK, then changing the model, can result in the
value getting set to 00, requiring Tes5Edit to fix it. This happened to me
yesterday, for example.
Not all ARMA records set these fields so it's not necessarily an error if the
flags are not set.
Original comment by rickerhk...@gmail.com
on 26 Feb 2013 at 3:51
Makes perfect sense. It jives with what we were fixing in the UDBP - a female
armor that wasn't working with the weight slider.
Original comment by arthmoor
on 26 Feb 2013 at 4:55
So
1) Decode them as rickerhk suggested
2) Make TES5Edit always set them to 02 (internal fixup)?
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 26 Feb 2013 at 5:35
Yep, that should do it.
Original comment by arthmoor
on 26 Feb 2013 at 5:56
Fixed in r1243
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 26 Feb 2013 at 6:52
Not so sure about auto-fixup. Since only the human-ish races use it. Dragons,
Horses, Draugr, etc all have these values at 00 00 00 00 for their ARMA skins.
Original comment by rickerhk...@gmail.com
on 26 Feb 2013 at 7:16
Oh, yeah, if that's what you meant by auto-fix you don't want to do that. Just
enable editing them, and only set to 02 when someone does so.
Original comment by arthmoor
on 26 Feb 2013 at 7:34
As you wish, no autofixing in r1244
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 26 Feb 2013 at 9:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
arthmoor
on 26 Feb 2013 at 3:04Attachments: