Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I have the same think in TES5Edit. It's all fuschia as long as it differs
between the two plugins. And by the way, in case of override this is as logical
as the other way around. Without a true master, who's to say test1 is better
than test2?
Original comment by HuguesLe...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2014 at 12:03
Let me throw some thoughts here. The way I see it, in absence of a master, we
should focus on what we have - the load-order. According to the load-order,
this is not a conflict, as one record is override by other. Can't be a conflict
as we only have 2 records, the one with a higher load index will always
supersede the one with lower load index. The purpose of conflict resolution
would be to show some conflict, but that requires more than 2 records, with
conflicting changes. A conflict would mean a change to the original record (the
one coming from a file with lowest load index) that does not propagate to the
high-index record.
In my opinion a master is just a file, which hosts a record. Whether the record
has the ID starting with it's load-order-index byte or not, does not matter.
In our case, the hosting file (1st appearance of the record in load order) is
test1.
In your vision, injected records are a sort of 2nd class citizen records, but
from the engine perspective, it does not care which file hosts a certain
record. All it cares is the load order and which file is higher in said order,
from the ones that contain a certain record.
I know there are exceptions to the above "rule", for certain record types (NPC
and NAVM comes to mind). Those are exceptions and can be treated as such.
Original comment by clampa...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2014 at 2:40
Some record overrides injected record? That happens maybe once per year, the
first time I ever see this in my modding life. Spending time on changing
something that is usefull for 0.00001% of users once a year is not worth the
time imho.
Btw I agree with Hlp on this.
Original comment by zila...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2014 at 6:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
clampa...@gmail.com
on 16 Dec 2014 at 5:57Attachments: