One to note for future discussion...
There may be an inconsistency with the term 'local name' for foods. It looks like the system has some local names embedded but the user can also add local names which then creates a different list with the same heading. This may not be too much of a problem. I've only just noticed it now entering dietary habits data. The list I'm copying from (old software, see 1st image) is ordered alpha by the local name (which I think must have been generated by the local field team, can't remember), it's not clear how the list in the new software is ordered, it's not alpha (see 2nd image).
One to note for future discussion... There may be an inconsistency with the term 'local name' for foods. It looks like the system has some local names embedded but the user can also add local names which then creates a different list with the same heading. This may not be too much of a problem. I've only just noticed it now entering dietary habits data. The list I'm copying from (old software, see 1st image) is ordered alpha by the local name (which I think must have been generated by the local field team, can't remember), it's not clear how the list in the new software is ordered, it's not alpha (see 2nd image).