Closed StenbergSimon closed 7 years ago
I later have noticed that "no growth" marks all phenotypes as no growth, which serves the purpose I suggested above for now, but at the expense of not being able to distinguish no growth from a bad curve.
No growth and empty marks all phenotypes as they refer to the entire curve while bad only marks for current phenotype. This also has implications for normalization, yes.
We have the colony images on ToDo-list.
Luciano should be able to add the quality index to the plot area somewhere quite easily.
Martin can make a test inverted Quality index order and you'll say if it seems better. To be clear, at present, there's only one Quality index storting for all phenotypes.
Showing meta-data with the plot is on ToDo-list.
Martin can make a test inverted Quality index order and you'll say if it seems better. To be clear, at present, there's only one Quality index storting for all phenotypes.
This is live on Experimental
as of version 1.4.97.
Changes are now also on Dev
.
Remaining issues:
BadData
marking so that it markes all phenotypes by default.BadData
marking with a 1
on the icon and key-bind it to the key below the current key for BadData
and let this version only mark the current phenotype.As a clarification, let OK
remain to only set OK
for current or add another OK
with a 1
on it like with the BadData
Still the quality index is experienced to be the same as before. Not sure what the mechanisms are since the actual quality index is hidden. It would be preferable to start at the worst curve and work ones way to the best curve when deleting or ok'ing curves.
As of v1.4.146
the QC index should now be reversed. I will close this multi-issue now. Please open individual specific issues for remaining improvements.
Superseeded of #108 , #109 and #110.
I've started using the new QC and noticed some things that would make life much easier: