Closed kjkjava closed 11 years ago
http://feedvalidator.org/ validates this revision just fine, but http://kmlvalidator.com/ does not around the TimeStamp element. It probably couldn't hurt to model the KML after what Latitude's history viewer exports. This would validate fine, require no conversion of the timestamp (though it would be less readable), and include accuracy.
Under the Placemark element:
<Data name="accuracy">
<value>2919</value>
</Data>
<Data name="timestamp">
<value>1307120201074</value>
</Data>
</ExtendedData>
Let me know and I would be happy to change this in another commit.
Sounds good, I'm not all that familiar with the KML format actually so would be great if you could do that :)
The XML Namespace http://earth.google.com/kml/2.2 returns a 404, as do other similar Google URIs for KML 2.2. This causes the output not to validate. Changed to http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2