search

Schematron / schema-2016

Unofficial copy of schema(s) for Schematron 2016.
Other
4 stars 2 forks source link

fired-rule should not be mandatory following an active-pattern #5

Open AndrewSales opened 5 years ago

AndrewSales commented 5 years ago

As reported by @dmj, a pattern may be active without necessarily having rules that fire.

David writes: "If I validate the [...] SVRL report [...] with Jing it complains about the following structure:

<svrl:fired-rule context="mods:name[not(parent::mods:subject)]"/>
  <svrl:active-pattern/>
  <svrl:active-pattern/>

Read: We have an active pattern with no matching rule.

But the RelaxNG of SVRL requires at least one svrl:fired-rule after an svrl:active-pattern."

Therefore he proposes https://github.com/Schematron/schema/blob/c785b593daf8b33ebd1bf7a942dd6ecd4c2d7bfd/svrl.rnc#L45 should be amended to read:

(fired-rule, (failed-assert | successful-report)*)*)+

AndrewSales commented 4 years ago

Addressed in the latest edition of the standard; will close if/when standard becomes publicly available.