Closed CodingAllan closed 5 months ago
@CodingAllan Please try to give it a simple (as with the issue) and provide details in the description ;-)
Hi @CodingAllan, I have now seen that there was a code shortly after my last review. Please request the review once changes are made, verify that all comments are addressed and answer on the opened conversations. Actually it looks like if two comments have been ignored?
@mknaranja , yes I just remembered that this was not merged yet and hence requested a review.
I commented on the suggestions you made and just wanted to ask if the way of correcting is acceptable. Im not sure if I am missing something.. but I did not ignore anything ?
@mknaranja , yes I just remembered that this was not merged yet and hence requested a review.
I commented on the suggestions you made and just wanted to ask if the way of correcting is acceptable. Im not sure if I am missing something.. but I did not ignore anything ?
I am sorry, I accidentally marked a conversation as resolved.
Merge Request - GuideLine Checklist
Implemented small fix where iterator could go out of bounds in creating anisotropic grid. This was the case, when nr_exp=fac_ani+1 and fac_ani>3 with alpha_coeff either being 0 or 2.
Guideline to check code before resolve WIP and approval, respectively. As many checkboxes as possible should be ticked.
Checks by code author:
Always to be checked:
If functions were changed or functionality was added:
If new functionality was added:
If new third party software is used:
If new mathematical methods or epidemiological terms are used:
[ ] The following questions are addressed in the documentation (if need be):
Developers (what did you do?, how can it be maintained?)
For users (how to use your work?)
For admins (how to install and configure your work?)
For documentation: Please write or update the Readme in the current working directory!
Checks by code reviewer(s):