Open kshefchek opened 3 years ago
are we saying we should perform a step to auto-add these at solr loading stage? rather than push upstream to the ontology?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:39 PM Kent Shefchek notifications@github.com wrote:
For example, colour blindness: https://api.monarchinitiative.org/api/search/entity/Colour%20blindness?prefix=HP
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SciGraph/golr-loader/issues/61, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOJ7TWKD6FVEZ5QB5J3SUZZW3ANCNFSM4U3JULZQ .
I was thinking there must be a way in solr to auto add via a synonyms file, or perhaps another method. But having them in the ontologies work as well.
of course we can't guarantee all ontologies will implement
but I would still opt for a general owl->owl synonym enhancer tool that can be repurposed elsewhere. this ties in with some stuff Nico is doing anyway.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 5:34 PM Kent Shefchek notifications@github.com wrote:
I was thinking there must be a way in solr to auto add via a synonyms file, or perhaps another method. But having them in the ontologies work as well.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SciGraph/golr-loader/issues/61#issuecomment-744972969, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOMZUSNHWEKQ4JYW45TSU24J5ANCNFSM4U3JULZQ .
For example, colour blindness: https://api.monarchinitiative.org/api/search/entity/Colour%20blindness?prefix=HP