Open brainstorm opened 10 years ago
Seems like an artifact during development of the test for deconseq, new reported results do not exceed 100%.
An underlying problem for deconseq not reporting meaningful contamination rates right now might be that the tests do not transform the reference data as advised in the manual:
http://deconseq.sourceforge.net/manual.html
@guillermo-carrasco I would give prio on benchmarking FACS vs FastqScreen, I'll try to fix this one but right now I believe we can plot some meaningful results with the performance.py
script.
Output reporting the reference has been fixed in 3a8cec1.
Agree, prio to FastqScreen :+1:
Contamination rate should never be >100...