Closed Vilin97 closed 10 months ago
I do like the little handy LowHigh
struct. It makes RSSA code look similar to normal code, which is good for maintainability. I'm not sure about performance, that would need to be measured. My instinct is that we would not win much performance by switching non-spatial RSSA-based SSAs to LowHigh
.
Changes Missing Coverage | Covered Lines | Changed/Added Lines | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
src/spatial/bracketing.jl | 20 | 25 | 80.0% | ||
<!-- | Total: | 24 | 29 | 82.76% | --> |
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 6133295964: | -0.05% |
Covered Lines: | 2299 |
Relevant Lines: | 2559 |
This is in preparation for the spatial SSA RSSACRDirect.