Closed ChrisRackauckas closed 1 year ago
Merging #289 (d4f8a8c) into main (6cbe99d) will decrease coverage by
3.07%
. The diff coverage is33.33%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #289 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.78% 65.71% -3.07%
==========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 897 913 +16
==========================================
- Hits 617 600 -17
- Misses 280 313 +33
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/LinearSolve.jl | 82.75% <ø> (-13.80%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/default.jl | 42.26% <11.11%> (-11.95%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/common.jl | 80.32% <100.00%> (-9.51%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
This is the last thing of https://github.com/SciML/LinearSolve.jl/issues/283 to be fixed up. It allows for different levels of conditioning assumptions, in order to allow for making a trade-off between performance and numerical stability. Right now I've handled the very ill-conditioned cases but not the well-conditioned case (which is the case the issue is interested in).